The following is a statement about Ecuador. What similarities or differences do you find between this example and the judicial system in India?
“It would be helpful if a body of common law, or judicial precedent, existed that could clarify a journalist’s rights. Unfortunately, Ecuador’s courts don’t work that way. Judges are not forced to respect the rulings of higher courts in previous cases. Unlike the US, an appellate judge in Ecuador (or elsewhere in South America, for that matter) need not provide a written decision explaining the legal basis of a ruling. A judge may rule one way today and the opposite way, in a similar case, tomorrow, without explaining why.”
The differences are:
1. Unlike the judges of Equador an Indian judge had to provide written decision that explains legal basis to the ruling.
2. Unlike Equador an Indian judge may not rule one way today and another way tomorrow.
3. Unlike Equador the Indian judges have to follow the instruction of the higher court.