Q7 of 9 Page 182

In your view, what should have been the verdict in Ravi’s case?

In my view, Ravi should have been given a chance to compensate his wrong deeds. Its sentence should be reduced to 1 or 2 years, but a fine should be imposed to compensate Samba’s injury and his expenses. Further the amount that Samba paid for the plot to Ravi should be returned to him.


More from this chapter

All 9 →
5

If someone is not satisfied with the decision of a Session’s court, what can he/ she do? If she/ he is dissatisfied with the decision of High Court, what can be done?

 6

What are the differences between the role of the S.H.O. and the magistrate?

 8

A person confessed his crime at the police station and the police locked him in jail for 6 months. Is this the correct procedure? Explain your answer.

 9

Can you identify different roles of the Executive and Judiciary given in this chapter?