Q2 of 8 Page 247

Correct the false statements:

• There was unanimity of opinion on all provisions during CA debates


• The makers of Constitution represented only certain regions of the country


• Constitution provides certain provisions to amend articles in it


• Supreme Court of India has said that basic features of Constitution may also be amended

There was no unanimity of opinion on the provisions during Constituent Assembly debates. Only the right to vote was unanimously agreed upon by everyone.


The makers of the Constitution represented the whole of India. It was representative of every region of the country.


Constitutional Makers laid down the provisions for amending the laws and articles in the Constitution so that the needs and demands of the people could be addressed with changing times.


In the Keshavananda Bharati Case, the Supreme Court argued that the basic features of the Indian Constitution could not be changed or amended in any circumstances.


More from this chapter

All 8 →
1

Find the odd one out:

• Indian Constitution adopts from experiences of the freedom struggle


• Indian Constitution adopts from already existing Constitutions


• Indian Constitution has remained the same since its drafting


• Indian Constitution provides principles and provisions for ruling the country

 3

Describe the unitary and federal principles of the Indian government as discussed in the CA debates.

 4

How does the Constitution reflect the political events of the time? Draw from previous chapters on freedom struggle.

 5

What difference would it have made to the making of our Constitution if the Assembly had been elected through universal adult franchise?