Archaeologists have no proper response for the central authority of the Harappans. Substantiate.
Although there are no archaeological records regarding the centre of power, archaeologists have made various assumptions:
i. Archaeologists have labeled a large building founded at Mohenjodaro as a palace.
ii. A stone statue has been labeled as the “priest-king”.
iii. Some archaeologists believe that there were no rulers in the Harappan society and that everybody enjoyed equal status.
iv. Others are of the opinion that there was no single ruler, but several. Each city has its own separate ruler.
v. Some archaeologists also believe that Harappa had a single ruler, given the similarity in artefacts, strategic settlements and the standardized ratio of brick size.
Couldn't generate an explanation.
Generated by AI. May contain inaccuracies — always verify with your textbook.