Consider the situation shown in figure (17-E6). The two slits S1 and S2 placed symmetrically around the central line are illuminated by a monochromatic light of wavelength λ. The separation between the slits is d. The light transmitted by the slits falls on a screen ∑1 placed at a distance D from the slits. The slit S3 is at the central line and the slit S4 is at a distance z from S3. Another screen ∑2 is placed a further distance D away from ∑1. Find the ratio of the maximum to minimum intensity observed on ∑2 if z is equal to
(a) 
(b) ![]()
(c) ![]()

Let the intensity of slits
and
be
. The amplitude through each slit be
.
For
, the phase difference is zero as it lies in the center of the screen. So here, the intensity(
) would be maximum.
![]()
For
, the path difference is ![]()
And the corresponding phase difference is
![]()
(a) For
,
![]()
This is the condition of destructive interference, so the intensity at
is zero. Hence, only one of the slits is illuminated and so the pattern on Σ₂ would be uniform with no maxima or minima. As maxima and minima are same, the ratio is one.
(b)For
,
![]()
In this case, constructive interference is taking place at
. So the intensity is maximum and is equal to
that is
.
In this case, slits
and
will form an interference pattern with alternate dark and bright fringes. Let the maximum intensity be
while the minimum will be zero for a dark fringe.
Hence the ratio is
.
(c)For
,
![]()
The intensity at
is thus
.
And intensity at
is ![]()
Let the amplitude at
be
and at
be
.
Therefore,
![]()
![]()
And
![]()
![]()
So maximum amplitude at Σ₂ would be
and minimum amplitude would be
.
Hence, the ratio of intensities is


Rationalizing,
![]()
Couldn't generate an explanation.
Generated by AI. May contain inaccuracies — always verify with your textbook.

