When Siddhartha was sitting in his garden, a wounded swan fell into his lap. He pulled the arrow out and washed the wound. The hunter then came and demanded prey. Siddhartha having saved it, refused to give it. Both went to the king for judgement. Write a dialogue in about 80 words.
Siddhartha, wondering at the wounded swan, pulled out the arrow and washed the wound. Immediately, he saw a hunter coming towards him. The hunter started demanding for his prey.
Hunter: Hey! It’s my swan. I killed it with this very arrow that plucked out of that beast. Give it, quick.
Siddhartha: You want it? Why? To further kill it with more pain and numb its very liberality? You don’t preserve independence of beings. You only know to crush innocence and innocent beings. You should never own anything.
Hunter: By the very law of nature, we all live and believe in the survival of the fittest. So what if I have killed a weak element of nature? It has been designed to be butchered by a subject higher to it. Now, give back my prey.
Siddhartha: This very law of nature also renders you to be subjected to the judgement of the King, who is superior to both of us in power and positon. Let him decide who is going to keep this innocent victim of the natural law.
At the king’ s court:
Siddhartha: My lord, the victim should be kept in the hands of one who shall help it to heal itself from the wounds of the world. I believe, I should be given with this responsibility.
Hunter: No! No! The man who kills his prey, eats his prey. My king, tell him to give back my food. Besides, nature conforms to the law of survival of the fittest and the prerogative of the powerful over the weaklings. And I have own over this weak bird.
King: So, by this very law of monopoly of resources by the powerful classes, I believe it’s me who should actually own this swan. I, being the King, holds the power to snatch away this feeble being from both of you. Ha! Ha!
Couldn't generate an explanation.
Generated by AI. May contain inaccuracies — always verify with your textbook.