Study the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow :
Critics of popular movements often argue that collective actions like strikes, sit-ins and rallies disrupt the functioning of the government, delay decision-making and destabilise the routines of democracy. Such an argument invites a deeper question: why do these movements resort to such assertive forms of action? We have seen that popular movements have raised legitimate demands of the people and have involved large scale participation of citizens. It should be noted that the groups mobilised by these movements are poor, socially and economically disadvantaged sections of the society from marginal social groups.
(i) Popular movements resort to which two types of assertive actions ?
(ii) How far do you agree with the arguments given by the critics ?
(iii) Why are groups involved in popular movements mostly from marginal social groups ?
(i) these movements resorts to strikes & rallies.
(ii) These actions hinders the functioning of government , decision makings are delayed. But these movements also holds the collective demands of people and similar expectations. So government intervention and resolutions to these movements become necessary.
(iii) They belong mostly to the marginal groups because they are the ones who are adversely affected as they are poor and political parties too do not pay much attention on them.
Couldn't generate an explanation.
Generated by AI. May contain inaccuracies — always verify with your textbook.

